﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Alerts &amp; Industry Summaries</title>
    <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts.aspx</link>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court slices through blade manufacturer’s request for a preliminary injunction in false advertising suit against rival.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/Court_slices_through_blade_manufacturers_request_for_a_preliminary_injunction.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. v. Coast Cutlery Co&lt;/em&gt;., 823 F.Supp.2d 1150 (D. Or. 2012)
    
    In &lt;em&gt;Leatherman Tool&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/Court_slices_through_blade_manufacturers_request_for_a_preliminary_injunction.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court rejects notion that selling legitimate products at seriously discounted prices can constitute trademark infringement.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Court_rejects_notion_that_selling_legitimate_products_at_seriously.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Brain Pharma, LLC v. Scalini&lt;/em&gt;, No. 12-60132-CIV-COHN/SELTSER, 2012 WL 1563917 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2012)
    
    Plaintiff,&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Court_rejects_notion_that_selling_legitimate_products_at_seriously.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Georgia State University students will continue to enjoy e-reserves thanks to the Fair Use Doctrine.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Georgia_State_University_students_will_continue_to_enjoy_ereserves.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Cambridge University Press v. Becker&lt;/em&gt;, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 1835696, N.D.Ga., May 11, 2012 (NO. 1:08-CV-1425-ODE) 
    
&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Georgia_State_University_students_will_continue_to_enjoy_ereserves.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:42:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Maywheather un'beat'able in copyright infringement suit.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Maywheather_unbeatable_in_copyright_infringement_suit.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Dash v. Mayweather&lt;/em&gt;, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 1658934, D.S.C., May 11, 2012 (NO. 3:10-CV-1036-JFA)
    
    The&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Maywheather_unbeatable_in_copyright_infringement_suit.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:41:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Ninth Circuit rules subjective similarity best left to juries.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Ninth_Circuit_rules_subjective_similarity_best_left_to_juries.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;L.A. Printext Indus., Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 676 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2012) 
    
    In a broad opinion the Ninth &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Ninth_Circuit_rules_subjective_similarity_best_left_to_juries.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:39:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: No likelihood of confusion between GROUPION and GROUPON marks.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_No_likelihood_of_confusion_between_GROUPION_and_GROUPON_marks.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Groupion, LLC v. Groupon, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 826 F. Supp. 2d 1156 (N.D. Cal. 2011) 
    Plaintiff Groupion offers a web-based&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_No_likelihood_of_confusion_between_GROUPION_and_GROUPON_marks.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:26:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Plaintiff does not need to allege use of its trademark to survive a motion to dismiss a false association claim.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Plaintiff_does_not_need_to_allege_use_of_its_trademark_to_survive_a_motion_to.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Neighborhood Assistance Corp. of Am. v. First One Lending Corp&lt;/em&gt;., No. SACV 12-463 DOC(MLGx), 2012 WL 1698368 (C.D. Cal. &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/IP_Case_Summary_Plaintiff_does_not_need_to_allege_use_of_its_trademark_to_survive_a_motion_to.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: SDNY tells Guess? to knock it off and pay $4.66 million in damages to Gucci for trademark infringement.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/SDNY_tells_Guess_to_knock_it_off_and_pay_466_million_in_damages.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 2012 WL 1847646, No. 09 Civ. 4373(SAS) (May 21, 2012) 
    
    In &lt;em&gt;Gucci&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/05/SDNY_tells_Guess_to_knock_it_off_and_pay_466_million_in_damages.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: 8th Cir. affirms – First National Bank South Dakota likely to be confused with First National Bank in Sioux Falls.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_8th_Circuit_affirms_First_National_Bank_South_Dakota_likely_to_be.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;First National Bank in Sioux Falls v. First National Bank South Dakota&lt;/em&gt;, No. 11-1568, 11-1683, 2012 WL 1887125 (8th&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_8th_Circuit_affirms_First_National_Bank_South_Dakota_likely_to_be.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:58:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Broad local recognition of FESTIVAL OF TREES enough to avoid categorization as a generic term.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Broad_local_recognition_of_FESTIVAL_OF_TREES_enough_to_avoid_categorization.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Primary Children’s Medical Center Foundation v. Scentsy, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 2:11-CV-1141, 2012 WL 2357729 (D. Utah June 20,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Broad_local_recognition_of_FESTIVAL_OF_TREES_enough_to_avoid_categorization.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Chanel, Inc. granted preliminary injunction against websites selling counterfeit Chanel products.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Chanel_Inc_granted_preliminary_injunction_against_websites_selling.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Chanel, Inc. v. chanel255.org&lt;/em&gt;, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 1941598, S.D.Fla., May 29, 2012 (NO. 12-21762-CIV)
    
    Chanel,&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Chanel_Inc_granted_preliminary_injunction_against_websites_selling.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court signals that manufacturing receivers designed to circumvent satellite encryption violates the DMCA and FCA.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Court_signals_that_manufacturing_receivers_designed_to_circumven.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;DISH Network, L.L.C. v. Sonicview USA, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 09–cv–1553–L(WVG), 2012 WL 1965279, slip op. (S.D. Cal. May 31, 2012) &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Court_signals_that_manufacturing_receivers_designed_to_circumven.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:53:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Failure to Allege a Single Example of Similarity Between Copyrighted Works Results in Dismissal.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Failure_to_Allege_a_Single_Example_of_Similarity_Between_Copyrighted_Works.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Dixon v. Sony Corp. of America&lt;/em&gt;, No. 12-60160-CIV, 2012 WL 1886550 (S.D. Fla. May 23, 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff sued&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Failure_to_Allege_a_Single_Example_of_Similarity_Between_Copyrighted_Works.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:50:37 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Federal Circuit Holds that Court Must Look at All Evidence When Determining Fair Market Value of Copyright License.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Federal_Circuit_Holds_that_Court_Must_Look_at_All_Evidence_When_Determining.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Gaylord v. United States&lt;/em&gt;, 678 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff sculpted a series of nineteen&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Federal_Circuit_Holds_that_Court_Must_Look_at_All_Evidence_When_Determining.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Florida Court rules infringement claim is not sizzlin.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Florida_Court_rules_infringement_claim_is_not_sizzlin.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Western Sizzlin Corp. v. Pinnacle Business Partners, L.L.C., &lt;/em&gt;2012 WL 2048261 (M.D. Fl. 2012) 
    
    The Middle&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Florida_Court_rules_infringement_claim_is_not_sizzlin.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Former business relationship in North Carolina enough for court to deny Capitol Ministries’s prayer for 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Former_biz_relationship_in_NC_enough_for_court_to_deny.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Capitol Commission, Inc. v. Capitol Ministries&lt;/em&gt;, 826 F. Supp. 2d 879 (E.D.N.C. 2011) 
    
    Capitol Commission&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Former_biz_relationship_in_NC_enough_for_court_to_deny.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Makers of headphones sound off in trademark dispute. Court finds plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction Ludacris.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Makers_of_headphones_sound_off_in_trademark_dispute.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Signeo USA, LLC v. SOL Republic, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 5:11-CV-06370-PSG, 2012 WL 2050412 (N.D. Cal., June 06, 2012)
    
    Plaintiff&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Makers_of_headphones_sound_off_in_trademark_dispute.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Size does matter - TEXAS TOAST mark deemed generic as applied to croutons.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Size_does_matter_TEXAS_TOAST_mark_deemed_generic_as.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;T. Marzetti Company v. Roskam Baking Company&lt;/em&gt;, 680 F.3d 629 (6th Cir. 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff, T. Marzetti Company, &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Size_does_matter_TEXAS_TOAST_mark_deemed_generic_as.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:41:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Using trademark symbol with a generic term does not constitute false advertising under 43(a). </title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Using_TM_symbol_with_a_generic_term_does_not_constitute_false_advertising.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. Snow Wizard Holdings, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 829 F. Supp. 2d 437 (E.D. La. 2011)
    
    Plaintiff&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/06/IP_Case_Summary_Using_TM_symbol_with_a_generic_term_does_not_constitute_false_advertising.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:40:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: ASCAP appeals District Court's reasonable royalty fee determination.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_ASCAP_appeals_District_Courts_reasonable_royalty_fee_determination.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers v. MobiTV, Incorporation&lt;/em&gt;, 681 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. May 22, 2012) 
  &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_ASCAP_appeals_District_Courts_reasonable_royalty_fee_determination.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: DC Circuit declares Copyright Royalty Board structure Unconstitutional.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_DC_Circuit_declares_Copyright_Royalty_Board_structure_Unconstitutional.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board and Library of Congress&lt;/em&gt;, No. 11-1083, 1012 WL&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_DC_Circuit_declares_Copyright_Royalty_Board_structure_Unconstitutional.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Hot dog company relishes district court’s frank decision denying preliminary injunction.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Hot_dog_company_relishes_district_courts_frank_decision_denying.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Vienna Beef, Ltd. v. Red Hot Chicago, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 833 F. Supp. 2d 870 (N.D. Ill. 2011) 
    
    Plaintiff Vienna Beef,&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Hot_dog_company_relishes_district_courts_frank_decision_denying.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Louis Vuitton awarded preliminary injunction against websites selling counterfeit LV goods.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Louis_Vuitton_awarded_preliminary.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. 1854louisvuitton.com&lt;/em&gt;, et al., 2012 WL 2576216, (D.Nev., July 3, 2012) 
    
    In&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Louis_Vuitton_awarded_preliminary.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:35:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Louis Vuitton’s Claim of Trademark Infringement Considered Unfashionable by Southern District of New York.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Louis_Vuittons_Claim_of_TM_Infringement_Considered_Unfashionable_by_SDNY.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Louis Vuitton Mallatier S.A. v. Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 2012 WL 2248593 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 
    
    Louis&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Louis_Vuittons_Claim_of_TM_Infringement_Considered_Unfashionable_by_SDNY.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:34:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Ninth Circuit explains relevance of non-consumer confusion.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Ninth_Circuit_explains_relevance_of_nonconsumer_confusion.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Rearden LLC v. Rearden Commerce, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 10-16665, 2012 WL 2402012 (9th Cir. June 27, 2012) 
    
    Plaintiffs&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Ninth_Circuit_explains_relevance_of_nonconsumer_confusion.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Seventh Circuit Finds Fair Use - South Park Prevails in Parody Proceeding.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Seventh_Circuit_Finds_Fair_Use_South_Park_Prevails.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Brownmark Films, LLC v. Comedy Partners&lt;/em&gt;, 682 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2012) 
    
    The plaintiff, Brownmark Films&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/07/IP_Case_Summary_Seventh_Circuit_Finds_Fair_Use_South_Park_Prevails.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:32:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: 7th Circuit Kills Copyright Infringement Case; Finds Kanye West’s Claims Stronger.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_7th_Circuit_Kills_Copyright_Infringement_Case.aspx</link>
      <description>
		In&lt;em&gt; Peters v. West&lt;/em&gt;, No. 11-1708, 2012 WL 3553417 (7th Cir. Aug. 20, 2012), the Seventh Circuit found two identically named hip hop songs&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_7th_Circuit_Kills_Copyright_Infringement_Case.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: All dolled up with nowhere to go: Court rejects copyright infringement claim brought against manufacturer of Bratz.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_All_dolled_up_with_nowhere_to_go_Court_rejects_copyright_infringement.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Belair v. MGA Entertainment, Inc., &lt;/em&gt;
      831 F. Supp. 2d 687 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) &lt;br /&gt;
    Plaintiff owned the&lt;/p align="left"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_All_dolled_up_with_nowhere_to_go_Court_rejects_copyright_infringement.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Federal Circuit – Using software to facilitate consumers’ purchases on Lens.com not “use in Commerce."</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Fed_Cir_Using_software_to_facilitate_consumers_purchases_on.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2012) 
    
    In 1998, the USPTO issued a&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Fed_Cir_Using_software_to_facilitate_consumers_purchases_on.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: First Circuit addresses burden of proof for willfulness finding in trademark case.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_First_Circuit_addresses_burden_of_proof_for_willfulness_finding.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. Paul&lt;/em&gt;, --- F.3d ---, 2012 WL 2542879 (1st Cir. July 3, 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff was in&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_First_Circuit_addresses_burden_of_proof_for_willfulness_finding.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:26:34 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court closes the book on copyright infringement claim - rules social media website not liable for users’ bookmarks.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Letting_users_bookmark_videos_not_infringement.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Flava Works, Inc. v. Gunter&lt;/em&gt;, No. 11-3190, 2012 WL 3124826 &lt;br /&gt;(7th Cir. Aug. 2, 2012) &lt;br /&gt;
    
    In vacating&lt;/p align="left"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Letting_users_bookmark_videos_not_infringement.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Medical syringe company finds competitors’ mark a sticking point; pricks its ire.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Medical_syringe_company_finds.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Medical Devices, Ltd&lt;/em&gt;., No 2012-1050, 2012 WL 3292920 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2012) 
    &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Medical_syringe_company_finds.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:24:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: SDNY Finds Farmers Too Sophisticated For Confusion</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_SDNY_Finds_Farmers_Too_Sophisticated_For_Confusion.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Aceto Agricultural Chemicals Corp. v. Bayer Aktiengesellsschaft&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;br /&gt;2012 WL 3095060 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) &lt;br /&gt;
    
  &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_SDNY_Finds_Farmers_Too_Sophisticated_For_Confusion.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:22:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Sixth Circuit settles questions related to fair use defense and apportionment of profits in copyright infringement case.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Sixth_Circuit_settles_questions_related_to_fair_use_defense.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Balsley v. LFP, Inc., &lt;/em&gt;--- F.3d ---, 2012 WL 3517571 (6th Cir. 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff Balsley is a newscaster. In&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Sixth_Circuit_settles_questions_related_to_fair_use_defense.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:54:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Southern District of New York bounces out trampoline maker’s trade dress infringement and dilution claims.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Southern_District_of_New_York_bounces_out_trampoline_makers_trade.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Urban Group Exercise Consultants, Ltd. v. Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 12 Civ. 3599, 2012 WL 3240442 (S.D.N.Y.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/08/IP_Case_Summary_Southern_District_of_New_York_bounces_out_trampoline_makers_trade.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:47:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Construction Law Industry Summary: Alabama Federal Court Reaffirms Hall Street’s Limited Bases For Vacating An Arbitration Award.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/Construction_Law_Case_Summary_Alabama_Federal_Court_Reaffirms_Hall_Streets.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Scurtu v. Hospitality and Catering Management Services&lt;/em&gt;, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 4061759 (S.D.Ala. September 13, 2012). 
   &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/Construction_Law_Case_Summary_Alabama_Federal_Court_Reaffirms_Hall_Streets.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Second Circuit holds that § 111 license does not extend to live streaming of copyrighted television programs over the Internet.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_2nd_circuit.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;WPIX, Inc. v. IVI, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., --- F.3d ---, 2012 WL 3645304 (2d Cir. 2012)
    
    The plaintiffs owned copyrighted&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_2nd_circuit.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:36:25 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court Partial to Partitioning Copyrights for Car Parts Providers’ Computer Program.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_Court_Partial_to_Partitioning_Copyrights_for_Car_Parts.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;US Auto Parts Network Inc. v. Parts Geek LLC&lt;/em&gt;, Nos. 10–56194, 10–56129, 2012 WL 3764704 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 2012) 
    
&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_Court_Partial_to_Partitioning_Copyrights_for_Car_Parts.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court vanquishes copyright infringement claim against Percy Jackson &amp; the Olympians.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_Court_vanquishes_copyright_infringement_claim_against_Percy_Jackson__the_Olympians.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;DiTocco v. Riordon&lt;/em&gt;, No. 11-4438-cv, 2012 WL 4016898 (2d Cir. Sept. 13, 2012)
    
    The Second Circuit threw out a &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_Court_vanquishes_copyright_infringement_claim_against_Percy_Jackson__the_Olympians.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Federal Circuit: Declaratory judgment plaintiff under license to patentee may have the burden to prove noninfringement.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_Federal_Circui_declaratory_judgment_plaintiff_under_license_to_patentee_may_have.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp&lt;/em&gt;., Nos. 2011-1313, 2011-1372, 2012 WL 4075624 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2012) 
    &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_Federal_Circui_declaratory_judgment_plaintiff_under_license_to_patentee_may_have.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:54:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Plaintiff’s misunderstanding of trademark versus copyright protection not enough for motion to dismiss.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_Plaintiffs_misunderstanding_of_trademark_versus_copyright.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Lafarga v. Lowrider Arte Magazine&lt;/em&gt;, No. SACV11-1501, 2012 WL 3667441 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_Plaintiffs_misunderstanding_of_trademark_versus_copyright.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: The beginning of a beautiful friendship — district court preliminarily enjoins use of Humphrey Bogart’s name.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_The_beginning_of_a_beautiful_friendship_district_court_preliminarily_enjoins_use.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Bogart, LLC v. Ashley Furniture Industries&lt;/em&gt;, Inc., No. 3:10-CV-39 (CDL), 2012 WL 3745833 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 28, 2012).
    &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/09/IP_Case_Summary_The_beginning_of_a_beautiful_friendship_district_court_preliminarily_enjoins_use.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:52:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court kisses lip print infringement claim goodbye – finds no likelihood of confusion between plaintiff’s and competitor’s lipstick logo on vodka.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Court_kisses_lip_print_infringement_claim_goodbye.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;JL Beverage Company, LLC v. Beam, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 2:11-cv-00417-MMD-CWH, 2012 WL 4472097 (D. Nev. Sept. 25, 2012)
    
    &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Court_kisses_lip_print_infringement_claim_goodbye.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:59:34 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court tosses Pizza franchisee’s request to renew franchise agreement.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Court_tosses_Pizza_franchisee.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Sioux Falls Pizza Company, Inc. v. Little Caesar Enterprises&lt;/em&gt;, 858 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (2012)
    
    In &lt;em&gt;Sioux&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Court_tosses_Pizza_franchisee.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Encroaching Upon Another Circuit: First Circuit Adopts Progressive Encroachment Doctrine in Trademark Case. </title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Encroaching_Upon_Another_Circuit.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Oriental Financial Group, Inc. v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Crédito Oriental&lt;/em&gt;, Nos. 11–1473, 11–1476, 2012 WL 5073529&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Encroaching_Upon_Another_Circuit.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Facebook History Publisher Not Liable for Copyright Infringement</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Facebook_History_Publisher_Not_Liable_for_Copyright_Infringement.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Greenspan v. Random House, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 859 F.Supp.2d 206 (D. Mass. 2012) 
    
    Aaron Greenspan, author of the book &lt;em&gt;Authoritas: One Student’s Harvard Admissions and the Founding of the Facebook Era&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Facebook_History_Publisher_Not_Liable_for_Copyright_Infringement.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Federal Circuit rejects heightened standard of materiality in analyzing primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive mark. </title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Fed_Cir_rejects_heightened_standard_of_materiality_in_analyzing_primarily.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;In Re Miracle Tuesday, LLC&lt;/em&gt;, No. 2011-1373, 2012 WL 4697447 (Fed. Cir. 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff filed an&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Fed_Cir_rejects_heightened_standard_of_materiality_in_analyzing_primarily.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Malibu Media Takes A Hit</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Malibu_Media_Takes_A_Hit.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1 through 12&lt;/em&gt;, No. 2:12 – CV – 01453 KJM DAD, 2012 WL 48666322 (E.D. Cal, Oct. 12, 2012) &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_Malibu_Media_Takes_A_Hit.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:07:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: MISSION for Mexican packaged food products and MISSION BURRITO for a Mexican food chain too close for 5th Circuit’s taste.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_MISSION_for_Mexican_packaged_food_products_and_MISSION_BURRITO_for_a.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Gruma Corporation v. Mexican Restaurants, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 11-41105, 2012 WL 4842036 (5th Cir. Oct. 11, 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_MISSION_for_Mexican_packaged_food_products_and_MISSION_BURRITO_for_a.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:57:29 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: State trademark registration is a diamond jeweler’s best friend in seeking a preliminary injunction.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_State_trademark_registration_is_a_diamond_jeweler.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Diamonds Direct USA, Inc. v. BJF Holdings, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 3:12CV303-HEH, 2012 WL 4574140 (E.D. Va. 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/10/IP_Industry_Summary_State_trademark_registration_is_a_diamond_jeweler.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:56:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Not Going Extinct: Judge Refuses to Reduce Dinosaur Photo Copyright Award</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/Case_Summary_Detail_Page.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Psihoyos v. John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 11 Civ 1416(JPO), 2012 WL 5506121 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2012)
    
    On&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/Case_Summary_Detail_Page.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Bittersweet Victory for Longhorn Steakhouse</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Bittersweet_Victory_for_Longhorn_Steakhouse.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Darden Restaurants, Inc. v. Wilson-Hall&lt;/em&gt;, No. 1:11—CV—03497—RWS, 2012 WL 5287031 (N.D. Ga. Oct. 22, 2012) 
    
    Darden&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Bittersweet_Victory_for_Longhorn_Steakhouse.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:27:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Can a State Block Your Domain Name?: 5th Circuit Remands Texas Case for 1st Amendment Inquiry</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Can_a_State_Block_Your_Domain_Name.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Gibson v. Texas Dept. of Insurance—Division of Workers’ Compensation&lt;/em&gt;, No. 11-11136, 2012 WL 5330890 (5th Cir. Oct. 30, &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Can_a_State_Block_Your_Domain_Name.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:36:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Court Concludes that Numeric Part Numbers Are Not Source Identifiers.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Court_Concludes_that_Numeric_Part_Numbers_Are_Not_Source_Identifiers.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Wilden Pump and Engineering LLC v. JDA Global LLC&lt;/em&gt;, No. CV 12-1051 ODW (DTBx), 2012 WL 5363319 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012)&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Court_Concludes_that_Numeric_Part_Numbers_Are_Not_Source_Identifiers.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:35:40 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: MGA Dolls are Bratz but not Infringers.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_MGA_Dolls_are_Bratz_but_not_Infringers.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Belair v. MGA Entertainment&lt;/em&gt;, No. 11—5259—cv., 2012 WL 5862339 (2d. Cir. Nov. 20, 2012) 
    
    MGA Entertainment&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_MGA_Dolls_are_Bratz_but_not_Infringers.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:48:53 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Nikita, Natasha: Judge Dismisses Copyright Suit Against Elton John</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Nikita_Natasha_Judge_Dismisses_Copyright_Suit_Against_Elton_John.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Hobbs v. John&lt;/em&gt;, No. 12 C 3117, 2012 WL 5342321 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2012). 
    
    On October 29, 2012, the Northern &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Nikita_Natasha_Judge_Dismisses_Copyright_Suit_Against_Elton_John.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:31:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Ninth Circuit Finds Laches Defense a Total Knockout.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Ninth_Circuit_Finds_Laches_Defense_a_Total_Knockout.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., 695 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2012) 
    
    Plaintiff sued for copyright&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/11/IP_Industry_Summary_Ninth_Circuit_Finds_Laches_Defense_a_Total_Knockout.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:39:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: One Law Firm Under a Groove, Just for the Funk of It</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/12/IP_Industry_Summar_One_Law_Firm_Under_a_Groove_Just_for_the_Funk_of_It.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Hendricks &amp;amp; Lewis v. George Clinton,&lt;/em&gt; No. C12-0841RSL., 2012 WL 5947638 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 27, 2012) 
    
    The&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/12/IP_Industry_Summar_One_Law_Firm_Under_a_Groove_Just_for_the_Funk_of_It.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:29:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Is Virtual Property Real or Intellectual?: Second Life Class Action Moves Forward.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/12/IP_Industry_Summary_Is_Virtual_Property_Real_or_Intellectual.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Evans v. Linden Research, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. C 11–01078 DMR, 2012 WL 5877579 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2012). 
    
    On November &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2012/12/IP_Industry_Summary_Is_Virtual_Property_Real_or_Intellectual.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:33:37 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Truly Incontestable: Trademark Owner Violates Opposition Settlement Agreement, But Keeps Mark</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/01/IP_Industry_Summary_Truly_Incontestable_Trademark_Owner_Violates_Opposition.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;AFFCO New Zealand, Ltd. V. American Fine Foods Corp&lt;/em&gt;., No.12-21325-CIV, 2012 WL 6644997 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 20, 2012)
    
&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/01/IP_Industry_Summary_Truly_Incontestable_Trademark_Owner_Violates_Opposition.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:50:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Urban Outfitters Driven From its Land by Navajo Nation . . . to Defend Lawsuit.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/01/IP_Industry_Summary_Urban_Outfitters_Driven_From_its_Land_by_Navajo_Nation_to_Defend_Lawsuit.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters, Inc., &lt;/em&gt;No. Civ. 12—195 LH/WDS, 2013 WL 258414 (D.N.M. Jan. 16, 2013) 
    
    In&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/01/IP_Industry_Summary_Urban_Outfitters_Driven_From_its_Land_by_Navajo_Nation_to_Defend_Lawsuit.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:02:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Yo Adrian, I Ain’t No Infringer</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/01/IP_Industry_Summary_Yo_Adrian_I_Aint_No_Infringer.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Webb v. Stallone&lt;/em&gt;, __ F. Supp. __, No. 11 Civ. 7517(JSR), 2012 WL 6691066 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 26, 2012)
    
    Rocky&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/01/IP_Industry_Summary_Yo_Adrian_I_Aint_No_Infringer.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Argument for a License to use Haiti Earthquake TwitPics via Twitter’s Terms of Service is Too Shaky for NY District Court.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/02/IP_Industry_Summary_Argument_for_a_License_to_use_Haiti_Earthquake_TwitPics_via.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      &lt;em&gt;Agence France Presse v. Morel&lt;/em&gt;, No. 10 Civ. 02730, 2013 WL 146035 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2013) 
    Photographer Daniel Morel has&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/02/IP_Industry_Summary_Argument_for_a_License_to_use_Haiti_Earthquake_TwitPics_via.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: California District Court Not Crazy about Extending First Amendment to Private Actors in the DMCA Context.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/02/IP_Industry_Summary_California_District_Court_Not_Crazy.aspx</link>
      <description>
		Last month, another opinion was published in the latest chapter of a highly publicized legal battle. In 2007, Plaintiff Stephanie Lenz (“Lenz”)&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/02/IP_Industry_Summary_California_District_Court_Not_Crazy.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:46:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Who Dat Think They Gon Beat Them Grocery Sellers?</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/03/IP_Industry_Summary_Who_Dat_Think_They_Gon_Beat_Them_Grocery_Sellers.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Who Dat, Inc. v. Rouse’s Enterprises, LLC&lt;/em&gt;, No. 12—2189, 2013 WL 395477 (E.D. La Jan. 31, 2013) 
    
    Who Dat&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/03/IP_Industry_Summary_Who_Dat_Think_They_Gon_Beat_Them_Grocery_Sellers.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: No First-Sale Doctrine for Digital Music Files</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/04/IP_Industry_Summary_No_FirstSale_Doctrine_for_Digital_Music_Files.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi, Inc&lt;/em&gt;., No. 12 CIV. 95 RJS, 2013 WL 1286134 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2013) 
    
    The&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/04/IP_Industry_Summary_No_FirstSale_Doctrine_for_Digital_Music_Files.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Industry Summary: Second Circuit Finds Rastafarians Transformative in Copyright Fair Use Case.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/05/IP_Industry_Summary_Cariou_Prince.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        &lt;em&gt;Cariou v. Prince&lt;/em&gt;, No. 11–1197–cv, 2013 WL 1760521 (2d Cir. Apr. 25, 2013)
    
    The Second Circuit Court of&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Case_Summaries/2013/05/IP_Industry_Summary_Cariou_Prince.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FTC Updates Merger Filing Thresholds</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/FTC_Updates_Merger_Filing_Thresholds.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On January 25, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its updated dollar thresholds to merger filings required by the&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/FTC_Updates_Merger_Filing_Thresholds.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Information Statements Due by January 31, 2012 for ISO Exercises and ESPP Stock Transfers</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/Information_Statements_Due_by_January_31_2012_for_ISO_Exercises_and_ESPP_Stock_Transfers.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        No later than
      
       January 31, 2012, employers must provide information statements to their employees to report&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/Information_Statements_Due_by_January_31_2012_for_ISO_Exercises_and_ESPP_Stock_Transfers.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:54:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Department of Labor Regulations Offer More Investment Advisers the Opportunity to Provide Advice to Participants in 401(K) Plans and IRAs</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/New_Department_of_Labor_Regulations_Offer_More_Investment_Advisers_the_Opportunity.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On December 27, 2011, new DOL regulations (the New Regulations)[1] designed to encourage more financial advisers to offer investment&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/New_Department_of_Labor_Regulations_Offer_More_Investment_Advisers_the_Opportunity.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 19:31:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Guidance Issued for Reporting the Cost of Health Coverage on Forms W-2</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/New_Guidance_Issued_for_Reporting_the_Cost_of_Health_Coverage_on_Forms_W2.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      In March of 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (Service) issued Notice 2011-28 which provided interim guidance regarding the&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/New_Guidance_Issued_for_Reporting_the_Cost_of_Health_Coverage_on_Forms_W2.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NLRB Decision Finding Arbitration Agreement Unlawful Affects Unionized and Non-Unionized Employers Alike</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/NLRB_Decision_Finding_Arbitration_Agreement_Unlawful_Affects_Unionized_and_N.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      The National Labor Relations Board (the "NLRB" or the “Board”) has ruled that a mandatory arbitration agreement preventing employees from &lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/NLRB_Decision_Finding_Arbitration_Agreement_Unlawful_Affects_Unionized_and_N.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:56:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>President Obama’s Recess Appointments to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and National Labor Relations Board May Be Unconstitutional</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/President_Obamas_Recess_Appointments_to_Consumer_Financial_Protection_Bureau_and_NLRB.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On January 4, 2012, President Obama announced that he will use recess appointments to make Richard Cordray the first director of the&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/01/President_Obamas_Recess_Appointments_to_Consumer_Financial_Protection_Bureau_and_NLRB.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:06:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>California Attorney General and Mobile Platform Providers Agree to Require Mobile Software Application Developers to Implement Privacy Policies</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/California_Mobile.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On February 22, California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced a privacy agreement concerning mobile software applications with the&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/California_Mobile.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 19:29:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Final Summary of Benefits and Coverage Rules – A Rocky Compliance Road for Employer Plans</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/Final_Summary_of_Benefits_and_Coverage_Rules.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        On February 14th the Departments of Treasury, Labor and Health and Human Services (the Departments) issued final regulations&lt;/span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/Final_Summary_of_Benefits_and_Coverage_Rules.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:54:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Future Guidance Outlined for Automatic Enrollment, Employer Responsibilities and Waiting Periods</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/Future_guidance_outlined_for_automatic_enrollment.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      This month, the Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury released yet another page from their&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/Future_guidance_outlined_for_automatic_enrollment.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 15:09:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Georgia Once Again Allows Nonlawyers to File Responses to Garnishments</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/Georgia_Once_Again_Allows_Nonlawyers_to_File_Responses_to_Garnishments.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      As we reported in our September 28, 2011 Legal Alert, the Georgia Supreme Court held last year that only licensed Georgia attorneys could &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/Georgia_Once_Again_Allows_Nonlawyers_to_File_Responses_to_Garnishments.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Liability Insurers With Grounds Must Timely Disclaim Coverage Even While Investigating Claim &lt;i&gt;George Campbell Painting v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.&lt;/i&gt;</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/Liability_Insurers_With_Grounds_Must_Timely_Disclaim_Coverage_Even_While_Investigating_Claim.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      The First Department of the New York Appellate Division has now overruled its own precedent and joined the Second Department in holding&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/Liability_Insurers_With_Grounds_Must_Timely_Disclaim_Coverage_Even_While_Investigating_Claim.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PTO Proposes Rules for New Post Grant Proceedings</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/PTO_Proposes_Rules_for_New_Post_Grant_Proceedings.aspx</link>
      <description>
		The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) published three Notices of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the implementation of the &lt;em&gt;inter&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/PTO_Proposes_Rules_for_New_Post_Grant_Proceedings.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Domino's Effect: How Following the Letter of the FCRA Could Save your Business from a Litigation Chain Reaction</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/The_Dominos_Effect_How_following_the_letter_of_the_FCRA.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Despite its somewhat misleading title, The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) applies to criminal background checks. The FCRA provides for&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/The_Dominos_Effect_How_following_the_letter_of_the_FCRA.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The NLRB Further Paves the Way for Mini-Bargaining Units</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/The_NLRB_Further_Paves_the_Way_for_MiniBargaining_Units.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) continues to pave the way for unions to organize relatively small, narrowly defined&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/02/The_NLRB_Further_Paves_the_Way_for_MiniBargaining_Units.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:49:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New JOBS Act Facilitates Private and Public Capital Formation</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/03/New_JOBS_Act_Facilitates_Private_and_Public_Capital_Formation.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        New JOBS Act Facilitates Private and Public Capital Formation 
    
    
      The President is expected to sign into law&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/03/New_JOBS_Act_Facilitates_Private_and_Public_Capital_Formation.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OSHA Revises Hazard Communication Standard</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/03/OSHA_Revises_Hazard_Communication_Standard.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        The United States Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) has announced a comprehensive&lt;/span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/03/OSHA_Revises_Hazard_Communication_Standard.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 19:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Title Companies Limit Ability to Use Deed-in-Lieu as a Remedy</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/03/Title_Companies_Limit_Ability_to_Use_Deed-in-Lieu_as_a_Remedy.aspx</link>
      <description>
		 It has come to our attention that Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, First American Title Insurance Company, Stewart Title Insurance&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; mso-ansi-language: EN"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/03/Title_Companies_Limit_Ability_to_Use_Deed-in-Lieu_as_a_Remedy.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EEOC Clarifies That Title VII Protects Transgender Employees and Applicants</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/EEOC_Clarifies_That_Title_VII_Protects.aspx</link>
      <description>
		On April 20, 2012, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) adopted the position that employment discrimination against&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/EEOC_Clarifies_That_Title_VII_Protects.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory Fees on Health Plan Insurers and Plan Sponsors to Fund Research</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/Mandatory_Fees_on_Health_Plan_Insurers.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Last week, the Internal Revenue Service issued proposed regulations on the fees imposed on specified health insurance issuers and plan&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/Mandatory_Fees_on_Health_Plan_Insurers.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 02:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NLRB Posting Requirement Further Delayed</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/NLRB_Posting_Requirement_Further_Delayed.aspx</link>
      <description>
		We previously reported on the National Labor Relations Board's ("NLRB") controversial new rule requiring employers covered by the National Labor&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/NLRB_Posting_Requirement_Further_Delayed.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SEC Interprets JOBS Act Changes to Registration and Deregistration Requirements</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/SEC_Interprets_JOBS_Act.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On April 11, 2012, the SEC issued guidance, in the form of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), on the implementation of changes to&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/SEC_Interprets_JOBS_Act.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:55:47 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court of California Clarifies California Meal and Rest Break Requirements</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/Supreme_Court_of_California_Clarifies_California_Meal_and_Rest_Break_Requirements.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On April 12, 2012, the Supreme Court of California issued a long-awaited decision involving the interpretation of California’s meal and&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/Supreme_Court_of_California_Clarifies_California_Meal_and_Rest_Break_Requirements.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The JOBS Act:  What to Expect from the Not-So-Private Private Placement Regulations</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/The_JOBS_Act_What_to_Expect_from_the_Not-So-Private_Private_Placement_Regulations.aspx</link>
      <description>
		One of the most significant provisions of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”), which was signed into law by President Obama&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/The_JOBS_Act_What_to_Expect_from_the_Not-So-Private_Private_Placement_Regulations.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:43:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Unauthorized Access Under the CFAA? Lessons Learned from United States v. Nosal</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/What_is_Unauthorized_Access_Under_the_CFAA_Lessons_Learned_from_United_States_v_Nosal.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On April 10, 2012, the Ninth Circuit en banc&lt;/i&gt; decision in United States v. Nosal&lt;/i&gt; was published,[1] resolving the question of how a &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/04/What_is_Unauthorized_Access_Under_the_CFAA_Lessons_Learned_from_United_States_v_Nosal.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Court Strikes Down NLRB's Revised Representation Case Rules</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/05/Federal_Court_Strikes_Down_NLRBs_Revised_Representation_Case_Rules.aspx</link>
      <description>Just two weeks after the April 30, 2012 effective date of the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) controversial new rule changing some of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/05/Federal_Court_Strikes_Down_NLRBs_Revised_Representation_Case_Rules.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court of California Deals Another Blow to State Meal and Rest Break Cases</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/05/Supreme_Court_of_California_Deals_Another_Blow_to_State_Meal_and_Rest_Break_Cases.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        In a decision filed yesterday, the Supreme Court of California issued a ruling that may help to slow the flood of lawsuits&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/05/Supreme_Court_of_California_Deals_Another_Blow_to_State_Meal_and_Rest_Break_Cases.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:49:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook to Require Mobile Software Application Privacy Policies</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/Facebook_to_Require_Mobile_Software_Application_Privacy_Policies.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        Like other software application platforms before it, Facebook has signed on to a deal with California requiring its mobile&lt;/span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/Facebook_to_Require_Mobile_Software_Application_Privacy_Policies.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:45:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Georgia Supreme Court Sanctions Coverage for “Diminution of Value” Caused by Damage to Insured Commercial Property</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/Georgia_Supreme_Court_Sanctions_Coverage_for_Diminution_of_Value_Caused_by.aspx</link>
      <description>
		In what may be the first appellate ruling in the United States on the issue, the Georgia Supreme Court has ruled that a commercial policyholder&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/Georgia_Supreme_Court_Sanctions_Coverage_for_Diminution_of_Value_Caused_by.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:40:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Insurance May Cover Losses for Companies Sued for Recording Zip Codes</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/Insurance_May_Cover_Losses_for_Companies_Sued_for_Recording_Zip_Codes.aspx</link>
      <description>
		Last year, the California Supreme Court held that retailers may violate the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971, Cal. Civil Code § 1747 &lt;em&gt;et&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/Insurance_May_Cover_Losses_for_Companies_Sued_for_Recording_Zip_Codes.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:19:41 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>National Labor Relations Board Provides a Road Map for Social Media Policies</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/National_Labor_Relations_Board_Provides_a_Road_Map_for_Social_Media_Policies.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Social media websites, such as Facebook, Twitter, and personal blogs, give employees an unprecedented opportunity to spread unflattering&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/National_Labor_Relations_Board_Provides_a_Road_Map_for_Social_Media_Policies.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:16:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Tackles Extent of Federal Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Over Compulsory Counterclaims in Cases Presenting Abandoned Claims</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/Supreme_Court_Tackles_Extent_of_Federal_Subject_Matter_Jurisdiction.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in Nike, Inc. v. Already, LLC&lt;/i&gt;, 663 F.3d 89 (2d&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/06/Supreme_Court_Tackles_Extent_of_Federal_Subject_Matter_Jurisdiction.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:55:58 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook Resolves User Right of Publicity Claims Concerning Sponsored Stories Advertising</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/07/Facebook_Resolves_User_Right_of_Publicity_Claims_Concerning_Sponsored_Stories_Advertising.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Facebook recently settled a class-action lawsuit stemming from Facebook’s alleged unauthorized use of users’ photographs in ‘sponsored&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/07/Facebook_Resolves_User_Right_of_Publicity_Claims_Concerning_Sponsored_Stories_Advertising.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:00:58 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Georgia Court Rejects An Insurer’s “Boilerplate” Language Purporting to Reserve Unasserted Coverage Defenses</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/07/Georgia_Court_Rejects_An_Insurers_Boilerplate_Language_Purporting_to.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Unless insurance coverage is absolutely clear, liability insurers usually will not assume the defense of an insured without issuing a&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/07/Georgia_Court_Rejects_An_Insurers_Boilerplate_Language_Purporting_to.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:45:47 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Texas Court Rejects “Common Interest” Privilege for Insurer Claims Reports</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/07/Texas_Court_Rejects_Common_Interest_Privilege_for_Insurer_Claims_Reports.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Typically, insurers will send periodic reports to their insureds regarding the status of pending workers compensation bodily injury&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/07/Texas_Court_Rejects_Common_Interest_Privilege_for_Insurer_Claims_Reports.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A National Footprint: Patent Office with Satellite Locations</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/A_National_Footprint_-_Patent_Office_with_Satellite_Locations.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Last month, the USPTO opened its very first satellite office in Detroit and announced the planned opening of three additional offices in&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/A_National_Footprint_-_Patent_Office_with_Satellite_Locations.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Final Patent Office Rules Improve and Clarify Inter Partes Review Proceeding</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/Final_Patent_Office_Rules_Improve_and_Clarify_Inter_Partes_Review_Proceeding.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On August 14, 2012, the U.S. Patent &amp;amp; Trademark Office (“PTO”) issued its final rules for implementation of the new “inter partes&lt;/i&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/Final_Patent_Office_Rules_Improve_and_Clarify_Inter_Partes_Review_Proceeding.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NAD recommends changes to advertisement highlighting one “true but not typical” customer experience</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/NAD_recommends_changes_to_advertisement_highlighting_one_true_but_not_typical_customer_experience.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
    
    
      
        
        
      
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    The National Advertising&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/NAD_recommends_changes_to_advertisement_highlighting_one_true_but_not_typical_customer_experience.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:25:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proposed First-to-File Rules and Examination Guidelines Open for Comment</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/Proposed_First-to-File_Rules_and_Examination_Guidelines_Open_for_Comment.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On July 26, 2012, the USPTO released in the Federal Register proposed changes to the patent rules and examination guidelines for&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/Proposed_First-to-File_Rules_and_Examination_Guidelines_Open_for_Comment.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SEC Conflict Minerals Rule Appears to Exclude Branded Licensed Products and Some Private Label Goods from Disclosure Requirements but Questions Remain</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/SEC_Conflict_Minerals_Rule_--_Questions_Remain_Surrounding_Disclosure_Requirements.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On August 22, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued its final rule implementing a provision of the Dodd-Frank&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/SEC_Conflict_Minerals_Rule_--_Questions_Remain_Surrounding_Disclosure_Requirements.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Media Sites: New Battlegrounds for Right of Publicity Disputes</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/Social_Media_Sites_-_New_Battlegrounds_for_Right_of_Publicity_Disputes.aspx</link>
      <description>
		 Social media websites are quickly emerging as the new battleground for right of publicity disputes, with the ultimate question being an old one&lt;/span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/08/Social_Media_Sites_-_New_Battlegrounds_for_Right_of_Publicity_Disputes.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fourth Circuit Widens Split Over CFAA and Employees Violating Computer Use Restrictions</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/09/Fourth_Circuit_Widens_Split_Over_CFAA_and_Employees_Violating_Computer_Use_Restrictions.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
    
    
      On July 26, 2012, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals weighed in on the debate about the meaning of the phrases “exceeds&lt;/u&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/09/Fourth_Circuit_Widens_Split_Over_CFAA_and_Employees_Violating_Computer_Use_Restrictions.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:42:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rules Regarding the Confidentiality of Workplace Investigations Can Violate the National Labor Relations Act</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/09/Rules_Regarding_the_Confidentiality_of_Workplace_Investigations_Can_Violate_the_National_Labor.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On July 30, 2012, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a decision in Banner Estrella Medical Center&lt;/i&gt;, reiterating that&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/09/Rules_Regarding_the_Confidentiality_of_Workplace_Investigations_Can_Violate_the_National_Labor.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:10:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Know Exactly What You Mean Before Claiming It’s “Green”</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/Know_Exactly_What_You_Mean_Before_Claiming_Its_Green.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      The Federal Trade Commission has issued its long awaited, final version of its “Green Guides,” formally known as the FTC’s Guides for the &lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/Know_Exactly_What_You_Mean_Before_Claiming_Its_Green.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NLRB Finds Employer Lawfully Discharged Employee for Facebook Posting</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/NLRB_Finds_Employer_Lawfully_Discharged_Employee_for_Facebook_Posting.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      As we have noted in past Legal Alerts, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has increasingly been addressing the application of&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/NLRB_Finds_Employer_Lawfully_Discharged_Employee_for_Facebook_Posting.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PCBs in Caulking Materials</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/PCBs_in_Caulking_Materials.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) recently settled an enforcement action with The University of Massachusetts&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/PCBs_in_Caulking_Materials.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Property Insurance and Severe Weather</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/Property_Insurance_and_Severe_Weather.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        Hurricane Sandy, Arctic winds, and an early winter storm are bearing down on the East Coast and are expected to pummel the&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/Property_Insurance_and_Severe_Weather.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will the SEC's Recently Adopted Conflict Minerals Rule Impact You?</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/Will_the_SECs_Recently_Adopted_Conflict_Minerals_Rule_Impact_You.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On August 22, 2012, pursuant to Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(p), the&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/10/Will_the_SECs_Recently_Adopted_Conflict_Minerals_Rule_Impact_You.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:10:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New PTA Calculations to Extend PTA Length for Many New Applications</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/11/New_PTA_Calculations_to_Extend_PTA_Length_for_Many_New_Applications.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      A November 1, 2012 case may entitle recent patents to a longer term. The Eastern District of Virginia ruled in Exelixis v. Kappos&lt;/i&gt; that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has not been properly calculating term extensions &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/11/New_PTA_Calculations_to_Extend_PTA_Length_for_Many_New_Applications.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:27:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New State Laws Decriminalizing Marijuana Use Likely to Have Minimal Effect on Workplace Drug Policies</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/11/New_State_Laws_Decriminalizing_Marijuana_Use_Likely_to_Have_Minimal_Effect_on_Workplace_Drug_Policie.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On November 6, 2012, voters in Colorado and Washington approved state initiatives making it lawful for persons age 21 or older to possess &lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/11/New_State_Laws_Decriminalizing_Marijuana_Use_Likely_to_Have_Minimal_Effect_on_Workplace_Drug_Policie.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:57:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NLRB Advice Memoranda Offer Guidance for Avoiding Unlawful Employment-at-Will Statements</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/11/NLRB_Advice_Memoranda_Offer_Guidance_for_Avoiding_Unlawful_Employment-at-Will_Statements.aspx</link>
      <description>
		Nearly all employee handbooks for nonunionized employees contain statements declaring that employees are employed “at will” – that is, their&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/11/NLRB_Advice_Memoranda_Offer_Guidance_for_Avoiding_Unlawful_Employment-at-Will_Statements.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Updated - Property Insurance and Severe Weather</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/11/Property_Insurance_and_Severe_Weather.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        As the Northeast continues to recover from Hurricane Sandy, many businesses are assessing insurance coverage for claims related &lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/11/Property_Insurance_and_Severe_Weather.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Companies Should Take Steps Now to Ensure Compliance with New Children's Products Regulations</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/12/Companies_Should_Take_Steps_Now_to_Ensure_Compliance_with_New_Childrens_Products_Regulations.aspx</link>
      <description>
		Potentially burdensome regulations governing children’s products take effect in less than two months. The new regulations, issued by the United&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/12/Companies_Should_Take_Steps_Now_to_Ensure_Compliance_with_New_Childrens_Products_Regulations.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:27:41 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Reserve Board Proposes Rules Regarding Enhanced Prudential Standards and Early Remediation Requirements for Foreign Banking Organizations and Foreign Nonbank Financial Companies</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/12/Federal_Reserve_Board_Proposes_Rules_Regarding_En_Prudential_Standards_and_Early_Remediation.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        The Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) published in the Federal Register on December 28, 2012 proposed rules that would amend&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/12/Federal_Reserve_Board_Proposes_Rules_Regarding_En_Prudential_Standards_and_Early_Remediation.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NLRB Requires Employers to Bargain with Unions Prior to Imposing Discipline</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/12/NLRB_Requires_Employers_to_Bargain_with_Unions_Prior_to_Imposing_Discipline.aspx</link>
      <description>
		When an employer has union-represented employees, the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) generally prohibits the employer from implementing&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2012/12/NLRB_Requires_Employers_to_Bargain_with_Unions_Prior_to_Imposing_Discipline.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2013 Benefit Limits</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/2013_Benefit_Limits.aspx</link>
      <description>
		The IRS and the Social Security Administration have announced the cost-of-living adjustments for various benefit plan limits for 2013. Limits&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/2013_Benefit_Limits.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>D.C. Circuit Invalidates President Obama's Recess Appointments to the NLRB</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/DC_Circuit_Invalidates_President_Obamas_Recess_Appointments_to_the_NLRB.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      In a January 25, 2013, decision in &lt;em&gt;Noel Canning v. NLRB&lt;/em&gt;, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/DC_Circuit_Invalidates_President_Obamas_Recess_Appointments_to_the_NLRB.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:30:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FTC Finalizes Amendments to Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/FTC_Finalizes_Amendments_to_Childrens_Online_Privacy_Protection_Rule.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      The Federal Trade Commission announced its final amendments to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (“COPPA Rule” or the “Rule”) &lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/FTC_Finalizes_Amendments_to_Childrens_Online_Privacy_Protection_Rule.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FTC Updates Merger Filing Thresholds</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/FTC_Updates_Merger_Filing_Thresholds.aspx</link>
      <description>
		On January 10, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its updated dollar thresholds to merger filings required by the&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/FTC_Updates_Merger_Filing_Thresholds.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:21:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Can a Beach Audit Ensure That Your Town Has a Beach?</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/How_Can_a_Beach_Audit_Ensure_That_Your_Town_Has_a_Beach.aspx</link>
      <description>
		 Following Hurricane Sandy, coastal communities were reminded of the fragile nature of the coast. Sea level is rising – there is no question&lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/How_Can_a_Beach_Audit_Ensure_That_Your_Town_Has_a_Beach.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:26:37 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Important Changes to the Federal Economic Espionage Act That Protect Trade Secrets</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/Important_Changes_to_the_Federal_Economic_Espionage_Act_That_Protect_Trade_Secrets.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        I.          Introduction 
    
    
    
    
    
    
      Two recent pieces of legislation—S. 3642 and H.R.&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/Important_Changes_to_the_Federal_Economic_Espionage_Act_That_Protect_Trade_Secrets.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:15:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inter-Partes Review “Dead Zone” Eliminated – All Issued Patents Are Now Eligible</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/Inter-Partes_Review_Dead_Zone_Eliminated_All_Issued_Patents_Are_Now_Eligible.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      35 U.S.C. § 311(c), as implemented by the America Invents Act (“AIA”), permits a petition for &lt;em&gt;inter partes &lt;/em&gt;review only after the &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/Inter-Partes_Review_Dead_Zone_Eliminated_All_Issued_Patents_Are_Now_Eligible.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Patent Regime Begins March 16, 2013: Are You Ready?</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/New_Patent_Regime_Begins_March_16_2013_Are_You_Ready.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      As widely reported, U.S. patent laws will change on March 16, 2013, when the U.S. will become a “first-inventor-to-file” jurisdiction –&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/01/New_Patent_Regime_Begins_March_16_2013_Are_You_Ready.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Department of Labor Amends Family and Medical Leave Act Regulations</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/Department_of_Labor_Amends_Family_and_Medical_Leave_Act_Regulations.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On February 6, 2013, the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) issued a revised set of regulations interpreting the Family and Medical Leave&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/Department_of_Labor_Amends_Family_and_Medical_Leave_Act_Regulations.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FTC Releases Recommendations for Mobile App Privacy Practices</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/FTC_Releases_Recommendations_for_Mobile_App_Privacy_Practices.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On Friday, February 1, 2013, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) released a staff report, Mobile Privacy Disclosures: Building Trust&lt;/a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2013/02/130201mobileprivacyreport.pdf"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/FTC_Releases_Recommendations_for_Mobile_App_Privacy_Practices.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:45:20 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., et al.</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/FTC_v_Phoebe_Putney_Health_System_Inc_et_al.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On February 19, 2013, the United States Supreme Court in &lt;em&gt;Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., et al.&lt;/em&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/FTC_v_Phoebe_Putney_Health_System_Inc_et_al.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Implications of Recent Tax Law Developments on Private Equity Mergers and Acquisitions</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/Implications_of_Recent_Tax_Law_Developments_on_Private_Equity_Mergers_and_Acquisitions.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      As it has always been, Federal income tax issues drive many of the structures of private equity funds and portfolio company investments.&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/Implications_of_Recent_Tax_Law_Developments_on_Private_Equity_Mergers_and_Acquisitions.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:41:22 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SEC Initiates Enforcement Actions Against Auditors and Executives of Failed Banks</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/SEC_Initiates_Enforcement_Actions_Against_Auditors_and_Executives_of_Failed_Banks.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Last month, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Enforcement Division filed two unrelated civil complaints – one against two&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/02/SEC_Initiates_Enforcement_Actions_Against_Auditors_and_Executives_of_Failed_Banks.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:21:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Department of Homeland Security Revises Form I-9</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/03/Department_of_Homeland_Security_Revises_Form_I9.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      On March 8, 2013, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), a subdivision of the Department of Homeland Security, introduced a &lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/03/Department_of_Homeland_Security_Revises_Form_I9.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dot-What? – The New gTLDs are Coming and it's Time to Understand the Trademark Clearinghouse </title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/03/Dot_What_The_New_gTLDs_are_Coming_and_its_Time_to_Understand.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      As part of the new Generic Top Level Domains (“gTLDs”) rollout, ICANN has announced the creation of a Trademark Clearinghouse, scheduled&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/03/Dot_What_The_New_gTLDs_are_Coming_and_its_Time_to_Understand.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IRS Temporarily Expands Voluntary Worker Classification Settlement Program</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/03/IRS_Temporarily_Expands_Voluntary_Worker_Classification_Settlement_Program.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has intensely scrutinized the classification of workers as independent contractors as&lt;/span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/03/IRS_Temporarily_Expands_Voluntary_Worker_Classification_Settlement_Program.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nasdaq Proposes New Internal Audit Function Requirement</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/03/Nasdaq_Proposes_New_Internal_Audit_Function_Requirement.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
         
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
     &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/03/Nasdaq_Proposes_New_Internal_Audit_Function_Requirement.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Avoid Making Unnecessary Property Protection Advances On New York City Properties</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Avoid_Making_Unnecessary_Property_Protection_Advances_On_New_York_City_Properties.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
    
    
      
        
        
      
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
      
        
        One way lenders can&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Avoid_Making_Unnecessary_Property_Protection_Advances_On_New_York_City_Properties.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Court Upholds Discrimination Claim Arising from Terminations Based on Employees’ Criminal Records</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Federal_Court.aspx</link>
      <description>
		Employers’ use of criminal records in making employment decisions about applicants and employees is increasingly coming under scrutiny. A recent&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Federal_Court.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Final HIPAA Omnibus Rules Require Attention</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Final_HIPAA_Omnibus_Rules_Require_Attention.aspx</link>
      <description>
		 The time has come to take out and refresh those business associate agreements, HIPAA privacy and security compliance manuals, and HIPAA privacy&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Final_HIPAA_Omnibus_Rules_Require_Attention.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:35:43 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Four Million Dollar Penalty for Tyson Foods Ammonia Handling Marks Increased Risk of RMP Enforcement Liability</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Four_Million_Dollar_Penalty_for_Tyson_Foods.aspx</link>
      <description>
		On April 5, 2013, Tyson Foods, Inc. agreed to a pay the United States a $4 million civil penalty to resolve alleged Clean Air Act Risk Management &lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Four_Million_Dollar_Penalty_for_Tyson_Foods.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:46:42 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Guilty Verdict in Critical Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Trial</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Guilty_Verdict_in_Critical_Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act_Trial.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      After a two-week trial before United States District Court Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California, David Nosal—the&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Guilty_Verdict_in_Critical_Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act_Trial.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:12:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Washington Supreme Court Rules That Insurers May Not Recoup Defense Costs Paid While Defending Under A Reservation of Rights</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Rules_That_Insurers_May_Not_Recoup_Defense_Costs_Paid_While_Defending_Under_A_Reservation_of_Rights.aspx</link>
      <description>
		On March 7, 2013, the Supreme Court of Washington joined a growing number of states holding that an insurance company cannot recoup defense costs &lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Rules_That_Insurers_May_Not_Recoup_Defense_Costs_Paid_While_Defending_Under_A_Reservation_of_Rights.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tatum v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al.:  Real Implications for ERISA’s “Hypothetical Prudent Fiduciary” Standard</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Tatum_v_RJ_Reynolds_Tobacco_Co_et_al.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      Overview&lt;br /&gt;
    
    
      &lt;br /&gt;On February 25, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina issued an &lt;/br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/04/Tatum_v_RJ_Reynolds_Tobacco_Co_et_al.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Disclose, Disclose, Disclose: California Attorney General Loses Privacy Case Against Airline But is By No Means Grounded</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/California_Attorney_General_Loses_Privacy_Case_Against_Airline_But_is_By_No_Means_Grounded.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      A California state court dismissed the California Attorney General’s case against Delta Air Lines for violation of the California Online&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/California_Attorney_General_Loses_Privacy_Case_Against_Airline_But_is_By_No_Means_Grounded.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:08:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>D.C. Circuit Court Invalidates NLRB's Poster Rule</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/DC_Circuit_Court_Invalidates_NLRBs_Poster_Rule.aspx</link>
      <description>
		Two years ago, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) published a rule that would require all employers covered by the National Labor&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/DC_Circuit_Court_Invalidates_NLRBs_Poster_Rule.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:55:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EPA Honing In on Vapor Intrusion Requirements for Contaminated Sites</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/EPA_Honing_In_on_Vapor_Intrusion_Requirements_for_Contaminated_Sites.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        
          Vapor intrusion (VI) is the term used for gas vapors migrating from subsurface sources into structures where people &lt;/span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/EPA_Honing_In_on_Vapor_Intrusion_Requirements_for_Contaminated_Sites.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:15:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Reserve Board Implements Rule on Retail Foreign Exchange Transactions</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/Federal_Reserve_Board_Implements_Rule_on_Retail_Foreign_Exchange_Transactions.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      The Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) has adopted Regulation NN covering retail foreign exchange transactions (“retail forex transactions”)&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/Federal_Reserve_Board_Implements_Rule_on_Retail_Foreign_Exchange_Transactions.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:36:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inevitable Disclosure of Trade Secrets is Not an Independent Cause of Action in Georgia</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/Inevitable_Disclosure_of_Trade_Secrets_is_Not_an_Independent_Cause_of_Action_in_Georgia.aspx</link>
      <description>
		In &lt;em&gt;Holton v. Physician Oncology Servs.&lt;/em&gt;, LP, No. S13A0012, 2013 WL 1859294 (Ga. May 6, 2013), the Georgia Supreme Court held that Georgia &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/Inevitable_Disclosure_of_Trade_Secrets_is_Not_an_Independent_Cause_of_Action_in_Georgia.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New York Court of Appeals Narrows Reach of Judgment Creditors against Non-Party Banks</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/New_York_Court_of_Appeals_Narrows_Reach_of_Judgment_Creditors_against_Non-Party_Banks.aspx</link>
      <description>
		 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
      
      
    
    
    
    
      In a decision significant for&lt;/span style="LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/New_York_Court_of_Appeals_Narrows_Reach_of_Judgment_Creditors_against_Non-Party_Banks.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Occupational Safety and Health Administration Opens the Door for Unions to Enter Non-Unionized Workplaces</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/Occupational_Safety_and_Health_Administration.aspx</link>
      <description>
		Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) is authorized to conduct&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/Occupational_Safety_and_Health_Administration.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:17:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stock Sale with an Asset Basis Step Up: New Alternative to the Section 338 Election</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/Stock_Sale_with_an_Asset_Basis_Step_Up-_New_Alternative_to_the_Section_338_Election.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      The Internal Revenue Service recently issued final regulations under Internal Revenue Code section 336(e) which provide for an election&lt;/span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Legal_Alerts/2013/05/Stock_Sale_with_an_Asset_Basis_Step_Up-_New_Alternative_to_the_Section_338_Election.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intellectual Property Innovations Class: 2011 Patent Case Law (July - December) and Its Impact on In-House Counsel</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/02/Intellectual_Property_Class.aspx</link>
      <description>
		Kilpatrick Townsend partner and co-chair of the firm's patent litigation team Steve Gardner will discuss important patent cases from the second&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/02/Intellectual_Property_Class.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:37:42 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Health and Welfare Planning: ACA Implementation Continues</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/07/2012_Health_and_Welfare_Seminar.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      As the dust still settles from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision, one thing is certain, employer implementation of the Affordable Care&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 9pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/07/2012_Health_and_Welfare_Seminar.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intellectual Property Innovations Class: 2012 Patent Case Law (January - June) and Its Impact on In-House Counsel</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/08/August_IP_Innovations_Class.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
    
    Kilpatrick Townsend partner and co-chair of the firm's patent litigation team 
    
      
        Steve Gardner
      
    
   &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/08/August_IP_Innovations_Class.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:49:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Protecting Trade Secrets</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/10/Protecting_Trade_Secrets.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      We invite you to listen to a brief complimentary podcast on&lt;i&gt; Trade Secrets Protection&lt;/i&gt;. This brief podcast will give you a glimpse&lt;/span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; FONT-WEIGHT: normal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/10/Protecting_Trade_Secrets.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IP Innovations - Joint Infringement and Inducement of Infringement After Akamai and McKesson</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/11/IP_Innovations_-_Joint_Infringement_and_Inducement_of_Infringement_After_Akamai_and_McKesson.aspx</link>
      <description>
		The Federal Circuit has considered, en banc, the proper standard for joint infringement and inducement of infringement in the Akamai v. Limelight &lt;/p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2012/11/IP_Innovations_-_Joint_Infringement_and_Inducement_of_Infringement_After_Akamai_and_McKesson.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:24:47 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2013 Health &amp; Welfare Seminar | What Every Employer Needs to Know About the Employer Penalty Taxes Under Health Care Reform</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2013/01/2013_Health_and_Welfare_Seminar.aspx</link>
      <description>
		
      
        The year of 2014 will usher in the most significant changes that employers have seen since the Affordable Care Act was passed&lt;/span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2013/01/2013_Health_and_Welfare_Seminar.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intellectual Property Innovations Class: 2012 Patent Case Law (July-December) and Its Impact on In-House Counsel</title>
      <link>http://www.kilstock.com/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2013/03/Podcast_Detail_Page.aspx</link>
      <description>Kilpatrick Townsend partner and co-chair of the firm's patent litigation team Steve Gardner will discuss important patent cases from the second half&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/en/Knowledge_Center/Alerts_and_Podcasts/Podcasts/2013/03/Podcast_Detail_Page.aspx"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>